You are here

Monsanto's Hometown Paper Takes Missouri Senator Roy Blunt to Task for Monsanto Protection Act

Submitted by Food Democracy Now on April 11, 2013 - 5:12am

Two weeks after the passage of the Monsanto Protection Act, Monsanto's hometown paper, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch has come out with a blistering editorial titled "Blunt's 'Monsanto Protection Act' Undermines Legislative Process'", taking Missouri Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) to task for sneaking the provision, Section 735 into H.R. 933, the must pass continuing resolution that funds the U.S. government for the next 6 months.

The editors of Monsanto's hometown paper were appalled enough, something rare these days, to take the time to write a scathing editorial, calling the Monsanto Protection Act, "a sleazy bit of business", noting that the crop biotech and factory farm industries both took advantage of the funding emerency and "larded up" the continuing resolution "with a lot of special interest deals".

And from the looks of campaign contribution report found in, Blunt received a total of $74,250 from Monsanto during the 2012 election cycle, Senator Blunt specializes in "special interest deals".

The recent condemnation of Senator Blunt and the Monsanto Protection Act is a direct result of more than 300,000 signatures from Food Democracy Now! members signing a letter asking that President Obama veto H.R. 933 and comes on the heels of an official apology by Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), the Chairwoman of the Senate Appropriation Committee where the deal was struck to allow Section 735 into the continuing resolution.

Regretfully, President Obama, like Congress, failed to live up to his constitutional duties, refusing to issue a signing statement declaring the Monsanto Protection Act "unenforcable" as USDA Secretary of Agriculture indicated the provision most likey is during an interview with Politico writer David Rodgers.  

According to Secretary Vilsack, the Monsanto Protection Act:

“Appears to pre-empt judicial review of a deregulatory action which may make the provision unenforceable.”

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch rightly calls the Monsanto Protection Act a bipartisan affair, and dispicably so. According to the editors, such bipartisanship is rare these days, but "politicians from different parties can agree on a lot of things, as long as [Congress] can do it in secret and there is special interest money and home-state political interests behind them."

This serves as an important reminder for the American people that we didn't get into the mess we're in because of a single party. Both Republicans and Democrats are to blame for the current disaster that supplies cheap junk food, drives farmers off the land and has resulted in an epidemic of obesity in the U.S. and whereever our highly-subsidized, junk food culture is exported to.

Remember folks, it takes two parties to destroy democracy and ruin America's food supply.

Enjoy the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, such honesty is rare these days!

Memo to selves: When editorializing in favor of greater cooperation among Democrats and Republicans, be careful. And be specific.

It turns out that politicians from different parties can agree on a lot of things, as long as they can do it in secret and there is special interest money and home-state political interests behind them.

Case in Point: House Resolution 933, a 587-page emergency spending bill passed to fund government operations through September and avert a government shutdown. It was signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 28.

As Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said when he was Mr. Obama’s chief of staff, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” Since HR 933 had to pass, it got larded up with a lot of special interest deals, including Section 735, a sleazy bit of business nicknamed the “Monsanto Rider” or the “Monsanto Protection Act.”

Section 735 appeared mysteriously — without benefit of debate — while the House bill was under review by the Senate Appropriations Committee. It orders the Department of Agriculture to ignore any federal court decisions that would block use of USDA-approved seed containing genetically modified organisms.

The upshot is that GMO corn and soybean seed — most of it Monsanto seed for crops resistant to Monsanto’s Round-up herbicide — already in the ground can stay in the ground, no matter what any court might say.

The language relieves Creve Coeur-based Monsanto and a handful of other seed and fertilizer companies of a great deal of risk. The relief will last for only six months, or until the next funding crisis creates different language. But it’s an important precedent, unless a court rules the language an unconstitutional usurpation of judicial review, which it well may be.

After a few days of anonymity, Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., admitted he was responsible for the mysterious appearance of the Monsanto Rider. As a senator from Monsanto’s home state, a recipient of $108,000 in Monsanto campaign donations since 2010 and as a lawmaker with a long record of using legislative tricks to benefit special interests, he should have been Suspect No. 1.

Who can forget Mr. Blunt’s “bootleg tobacco helps terrorists” defense of 2002? In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Congress passed a bill creating the Department of Homeland Security. Mr. Blunt, then a top House leader, tried to sneak an amendment into the bill that would have have cracked down on Internet- and black-market tobacco sales. “It’s a serious homeland security issue,” he insisted when he was found out. At the time, he was dating a top tobacco company lobbyist, whom he later married.

The next year Mr. Blunt tried to persuade then-Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, to secretly amend a $79 billion Iraq war-funding bill to benefit FedEx and UPS. So, having tried to mess with the Homeland Security bill and Iraq War funding, the Monsanto Protection Act probably didn’t seem like a big deal.

Besides, as we noted above, HR 933 was a bipartisan special interest effort. The bill also took money away from a school breakfast program to ensure that fewer meat inspectors would be laid off because of federal budget cuts. This assures big poultry operations, like Tyson Foods and Perdue Farms, that while a few children may have to skip breakfast, their business will not suffer unduly from budget cuts.

By sheer coincidence, Tyson is headquartered in Arkansas, the home state of Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor, chairman of the Agriculture appropriations subcommittee. The new chairman of the full appropriations committee is Sen. Barbara Mikulski, Democrat of Maryland. Guess which state Perdue Farms calls home?

Mr. Blunt is a conservative Republican. Mr. Pryor is a moderate Democrat. Ms. Mikulski is a liberal Democrat. Sometimes bipartisanship isn’t what it’s cracked up to be.

In a way, none of this is a big deal — the Monsanto Rider may be thrown out, and even it’s not, it will have to be revisited later this year.

But it is a big deal. Damn the committee hearings. Damn political philosophy. Damn the public interest. Damn the constitution. Use the funding crisis to take care of the donors. Do the deals in the seams, and if at all possible, do it in secret.

The latest Gallup Poll says 13 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is doing its job. That seems a little high.

Originally posted: The St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

© 2020 Food Democracy Now | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Log In |

Created by RA Globe